The World's Best Architecture Schools in Research: 2007

top rule

The Good Oil

Every two years we survey and rate the research performance of the architecture schools in the English-speaking nations. Our survey is intended to aid postgrads {graduates} seeking a place to conduct architectural research.

The survey does not claim to be a guide to those keen to become working architects. Our rankings won't help someone out of high school looking to maximize their future prospects and income.

For that, you should buy the survey from DesignIntelligence, which provides a rankings list of American schools. Our survey has two advantages. First, it is free. Second, our survey includes every single school in the USA and Canada, unlike DesignIntelligence' paltry efforts. Everyone should examine the discussions at ArchiNect.

New Rating the individual professors. For the first time, we provide information on every single academic in the architecture schools. Based on our 2007 survey data.

Who should use our ratings?

We have attempted to measure the architecture schools and their academics {professors} in terms of their research output. We make no statement of their quality of teaching. Our only claim that is that postgrads looking to complete higher studies, or undergrads looking for an intellectual challenge, should cast a glance over our ratings.

The 2005 ratings

The original 2005 Research Report is available for free download. Its data and methodology have been superseded by our 2007 rankings. You should read it for the substantial information it has about our data collection, and a commentary on the schools' websites.

The 2007 ratings

Results for our 2007 survey are now complete. Survey data was collected in the fourth quarter of 2006 and first quarter of 2007. The study will be published as a free downloadable pdf file after we complete the survey of 2009. Until then, the results are available on this website. Features of the 2007 report:

Where are the ratings?

Right here:

Our methodology: what and we who counted

Who got counted

In each of our surveyed countries, we counted every architecture school producing a qualification allowing the graduate to practise architecture in that country. We counted the smallest architecture unit in the school. So if a school contained departments of architecture, urban design and structures, we only counted the people in the architecture department.

We examined the websites of these schools to obtain a list of every senior academic (naturally, we assumed the lists on these sites were accurate). These are the people whom their university expects and demands research from. To be counted as a senior academic, a person had to be:

What we counted

We went to the two greatest architecture libraries in the English-speaking world: the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) British Architectural Library in the UK; and the Avery Architectural and Fine Arts Library at Columbia University in the USA. If you are going to find architectural research anywhere, you will find it here. For each academic, we counted his or her references in the two vast library databases each institution maintains. This gave a research score for each person. We then calculated the median research score for each school. That is, the typical research score of an academic at that school.

Much more information can be found in the 2005 report.

2007 significant methodology changes

We used an Author search rather than a Keyword search with the RIBA database, to bring it into line with the Avery search.

In a very important move, we also discarded our previous Research Intensity measure for a simpler and more transparent indicator: the median research score. All statistics is a sleight of hand, and all we can do is bring you what we believe is the fairest way to rank a school as a research performer. We believe that the new measure, the median research score, does that best.

The numerical values of the 2007 report are therefore not comparable to the 2005 report.

Schools not included

We did not count professors emeritus (emerita!), visitors, studio professors (in the North American system) and other obvious blow-ins. Disregarding these people does not disadvantage a school: on the contrary it acts in their school's favour, since they are not expected to conduct research.

The table below shows the schools we had to ignore completely for the reasons cited.

Nation University Reason
Aus Charles Darwin University Does not offer professional degree
Aus University of Canberra No list of academics
Can Ryerson University Does not offer professional degree
Can Université de Montréal Not primarily Anglophone
Can Université Laval Not primarily Anglophone
NZ Otago Polytechnic No list of academics
RSA Technikon Witwatersrand No site or unreachable
RSA University of KwaZulu-Natal No list of academics
RSA University of Pretoria No site or unreachable
UK De Montfort University No list of academics
UK Nottingham Trent University No list of academics
UK University of Brighton No list of academics
UK University of East London No list of academics
UK University of Huddersfield No list of academics
UK University of Portsmouth No list of academics
USA Boston Architectural College Outside university system
USA Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture Outside university system
USA Parsons Institute of Design Could not identify eligible academics
USA Polytechnic University of Puerto Rico Could not identify eligible academics
USA Roger Williams University No list of academics
USA Savannah College of Art and Design Could not identify eligible academics
USA Southern California Institute of Architecture Outside university system
USA Universidad de Peurto Rico Not primarily Anglophone
USA University of Hartford Could not identify eligible academics
USA University of Nevada, Las Vegas No site or unreachable
USA University of South Florida No list of academics
USA Woodbury University No site or unreachable

Schools not counted in the 2007 research rankings. No list of academics: School did not list who worked there. Could not identify eligible academics: Staff {faculty} listed, but unable to identify those satisfying our eligibility criteria. Not primarily Anglophone: Schools whose staff published primarily in languages unlikely to be counted by our library databases. Outside university system: Schools that do not claim to conduct university-quality research as a major mission.

Architecture schools and education
Rating individual architecture professors
How to become famous without building anything
You need class to become an architect
How to be a brilliant architecture professor
So, you want to study architecture
Surviving architecture school