Australian Architecture Students Rate their Schools: Part 1

Basic structure of education

Until the early 2000s, the Australian architecture schools followed the United Kingdom model of a double bachelors, or bachelors and diploma. In the first decade of the 21st century the Australian schools decided to ape their American cousins in a sad example of architectural credential inflation and provide a degree structure consisting of a bachelors degree, variously called, followed by a masters in architecture. Only now do we have enough masters students graduating to provide opinions about their education. You can read more on our page about working as an architect in Australia.

Measuring student satisfaction

So where should you study? Depends who you ask.

• Ask the students. They want a satisfying, challenging, useful and equitable learning experience. We discuss how happy Aussie architecture students are compared to their compatriots in other disciplines here.
• Ask their future employers, the architecture firms. They want solid, skilled and cheap labour.
• Ask the architecture teachers. They want tenure, bright students and time to work on their masterpiece.
• Ask the universities that house the schools. They want academic papers and books, and a flood of research money from the government. We provide a separate ranking table about this here.

On this page we provide the latest data on what the students think of their education. You have a problem with our methodology, do your own research.

Our Data: The CEQ study

We used for our data the annual Australian Course Experience Questionnaire.

The survey uses several different scales to measure how satisfied graduates are with their courses. We used the Overall Satisfaction Index (OSI) from this survey to make our analyses, for pass bachelors degrees. We converted these to ranks for each year.

In 2008 Universities Australia, the supposed owner of the CEQ data, refused to publish the data for that year and also expunged all the previously public domain data for the prior 14 years! For more information, read our page on what Australian universities don't want you to know. But we've found our own ways around that.

Some caveats

The key point is that this methodology measures what students think of their recent education. Not employers, not parents, not people who graduated thirty years ago. Let us emphasize that:

• The survey says nothing about a school's research performance or community service. But then, if you are a student looking for a school, you don't care much about those, anyway.
• This is what students think: whether their perceptions are valid, and what employers think, are other issues.
• Graduates' ratings can be very volatile: one year's grads may give a much worse or better rating than just the next year's crop.
• The survey polls the prior year's graduates. They are really assessing their experience of several years. There is therefore an inherent time-lag in the data: a lot of grudge factor, and many memories of happy times. A melange.

Student satisfaction ratings

We have the CEQ studies from 1994 to the most recent available. Here is our interpretation of the results from our summary charts.

• University of Adelaide. Up and down. Never a great performer. Had a brief peak in 2002, but on the slide since then. Location: Small, perfectly formed capital of a small state.
• University of Canberra. Consistently ranked a bottom-feeder by its own graduates, until 2007, which makes us very suspicious. A new regime, perhaps? You won't be able to learn much from its website. This is the Mary Celeste of Australian architecture schools. After four years of searching, we finally discovered who worked there just in time for our 2009 research rankings sweep. If anyone can show us a good reason to study architecture at Canberra, we'd like to hear about it. Location: The city of Canberra is a vast park with some buildings in it. If you like bushwalking, but a nightlife that even nuns find boring, this is your town.
• Curtin University of Technology. Varies from strong to middling, which is no bad thing. Put Curtin on your list of possibles if you want a solid education without the intellectual foo-fa. Location: The city of Perth is a mining boom town: think Las Vegas with iron ore.
• Deakin University. Consistently ranked very well by students. Not exactly a great intellectual leader, as shown in our research rankings, but does that matter? Location: Regional centre, only an hour or so away from somewhere interesting.
• University of Melbourne. A lot of smart people there in the best university in country (ANU's silly pretensions not withstanding). Although students rate it as mediocre, we would suggest this school for those of a more intellectual bent. Location: Cosmopolitan.
• University of New South Wales (UNSW). A very large school traditionally regarded as a perfectly competent sausage-machine. You want a job, you go to UNSW. Student ratings plummeted in 1999, and are only now clawing their way upwards. There may be happier places to attend, like Dotheboys Hall. Location: Cosmopolitan.
• University of Newcastle. During the 1980s and 1990s its mentoring program was acclaimed. Students have trashed it since its peak in 2001. A weird statistical spike in 2008 does not give us any confidence. What went so wrong? We don't know. Location: Regional centre, only an hour or so away from somewhere cosmopolitan.
• University of Queensland. Rated in the upper-third since 2003. Put this one on your list. Location: Brisbane is a big country town that you can traverse in a few minutes.
• Queensland University of Technology (QUT). Very erratic, and definitely on the nose. You can do better. Location: See above, University of Queensland.
• RMIT University. Every so often shows signs of genius, only to sink back to the middle of the pack. Location: Cosmopolitan.
• University of South Australia. We hold our tongue¹.
• University of Sydney. We discuss our experiences at our old alma mater here. Completely sclerotic, we regret to report. All the senior staff have been there for decades, and are a scant few years if not months from retirement. Try applying in 2015, when they are all gone. Location: Cosmopolitan.
• University of Tasmania. Had an excellent reputation from 1985–1995 as a nurturing and creative environment: you could have been in the sixties. Subsequent volatility seems to have subsided. Since 2004, students have rated it well. Location: Launceston is a small town, in a very cool climate. If you decide to go internet dating, make your criteria very, very broad.
• University of Technology, Sydney (UTS). Perfectly average. You can do better. We have much more information here. Location: Cosmopolitan.
• University of Western Australia. Too little information to make an assessment. Some years ago they converted their bachelors into a degree previously unknown to humanity. This simple boondoggle rendered them impervious to comparison in the CEQ statistics, since no other school had such a qualification. With the late-2000s Australian transition to a Masters as professional qualification, they can once again be subject to scrutiny. Plenty of other places to choose from is our advice. Location: See Curtin, above.